Tuesday, October 4, 2011

Dead Sea Scrolls



The Psalms Scroll with transcription.

It has been said by a noted archeologist’s that The Dead Sea Scrolls probably had the greatest impact on the Holy Bible beyond any other discovery to date. They have provided Old Testament manuscripts almost 1,000 years older than the previous oldest manuscripts. They have reinforced the belief that the Old Testament its self has been accurately communicated. Plus, they provide a wealth of information on the time period leading up to, and during, the life of Jesus Christ.


The Dead Sea Scrolls are a collection of 972 texts from the Hebrew Bible and extra-biblical documents, the first of which were stumbled up on by a few young goat herders in January of 1947 on the northwest shore of the Dead Sea, from which they obtained their name.

The texts are of great religious and historical significance, as they include the oldest known surviving copies of Biblical text as well as teachings, concepts, and practices claimed to be supported by or taught in the Bible but which are based on incorrect interpretations (thus said to be extra-biblical). 

They are written in Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek, primarily on parchment, which is made from animal skins such as calves or goats, but some are written on papyrus which is a thick paper like material deriving from the plant with the same name. These documents generally date during to the period of 150 BC and 70 AD.

In January of 1947, Muhammed edh-Dhib and his cousin (there tribe is referred to as “Bedouin” which is an Arabic term meaning desert dwellers)    discovered the caves where they shortly there after found the documents, not far from the ruins of Khirbet Qumran (believed to be an ancient Israeli settlement) that has been known to European explorers since a little before 1851; the scrolls were found there in a total of 11 nearby caves.

The Bedouin (the desert dwelling boys) initially took 3 of the scrolls to a dealer in Bethlehem, who returned them, saying they were worthless, as well as warning them that the documents might have been stolen from a synagogue. Unconcerned, a few days later the Bedouin  went to a nearby market, where a Syrian Christian offered to buy them (by now they had 6 scrolls) but then a sheikh joined in their conversation and suggested they take the scrolls to a cobbler and part-time antiques dealer near by. The Bedouin along with other dealers returned to the cave site, leaving one scroll behind with the cobbler and selling the others to a dealer for the equivalent of 29 US Dollars.

The Dead Sea Scrolls eventually went up for sale, in an advertisement in the June 1, 1954 issue of the Wall Street Journal, a copy of which is displayed below:

On July 1, 1954 after delicate negotiations, they were purchased in New York, New York, USA for $250,000 US. This sum is equal to just a bit more than 2 Million (2.04) US Dollars today.

Just as you would expect in the Middle East, there is now a heated dispute regarding legal ownership of the Dead Sea Scrolls.  Here's why: Prior to the “6 day War” in 1967 the ancient Israeli city of Khirbet Qumran, as well as the West Bank of the Dead Sea, was within Jordanian confines, as opposed to Israel; Jordan further alleges that the scrolls were stolen from the Rockefeller Museum, which was operated by Jordan from 1966 until the Six-Day War when advancing Israeli forces took control of the Museum. Jordan, therefore regularly demands their (the scrolls) return and petitions third-party countries that host the scrolls to return them to Jordan instead of to Israel, claiming they have legal documents that prove Jordanian ownership of the scrolls.

For example, when the scrolls arrived for a 2009 exhibition at the Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto, the Palestinian Authority and others called upon the Canadian government to cancel the showing and seize the scrolls under disputed international law. Unfortunately for the Jordanians, Ottawa dismissed the demands and the exhibit was enormously successful, with the scrolls returning to Israel upon its conclusion. Jordan has also asked the United Nations to intervene.


Sources …

2 comments:

  1. I'm still trying to figure out who got to decide what books were put into the Bible. They have come across several books, such as the Book of Mary and the Book of Judas, that were left out of the Bible. Both of those books paint a very different picture of the story of Jesus than what is normally taught. There are several other books that contradict normal teachings too. So, who got to decide what books were included and excluded? It appears to me that we have never been given the true story of religion. Since King James had the Bible translated into English while he was head of the "Church", I imagine that he had it translated to express his views and not necessarily what it actually meant. Just one man's opinion though. I could be wrong, but don't think so.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The various books of the bible were only selected if the were considered to be within what is called the canon; that refers to the books regarded by multiple churches as being inspired by God . No particular church created the canon, but the churches and their councils gradually (over several hundred years) accepted the list of books recognized by believers as being inspired. As I recall the first 3 or 4 books came straight from the Jewish Torah. If you want to blame just one person or organization, then look to a guy named Athanasius who was also known as Saint Athanasius (293 to 373 AD). He was a theologian and an Egyptian national leader as well as the chief defender of Christian orthodoxy in the 4th-century. In 367 AD he official recognized the canonized books of the day as official, thus effectively creating the accepted books of the bible. In short the answer that you’re looking for may be pined on the Catholic Church of the 4th century. King James had the Bible translated by a whole lot of scribes of his day so I doubt that he had a lot to do with what was actually translated into whatever. But if you think about it much is does seem a little suspicious. On the other hand, the translation of the Dead Sea Scrolls indicates the KJV is pretty close to right overall.

    ReplyDelete