The Soap Nut Find us on ETSY

Sunday, February 17, 2013

Was The First American Slave Owner a Black Man?








Before 1655 there were no legal slaves in the American colonies, but indentured servants were common. All Servant owners or masters were required to free their servants after their time was up which was typically a period of 4 to 7 years ; you may recall we touched upon this subject with a “Post” titled Indentured Servants or Redemptioners in December of 2011.



It was long believed that indentured servant John Casor was the first individual to be declared a slave in what would later become the United States, and Anthony Johnson a black man; would then be the first known slaveholder in America. Historical court records prove that only part of that statement is true.



The Story of John Casor and his relationship with Anthony Johnson, go’s something like this: Johnson was a man from modern-day Angola that’s located in Southern Africa; in 1619 he was transported to the Virginia Colony to work for a tobacco farmer. When Johnson’s indenture term was up, he was released and recognized as a “free man”.  He must have been the industrious sort because by 1651 he owned a successful farm himself, consisting of 250 acres which he ran with the help of 5 black indentured servants.  In 1654, it was time for Johnson to release John Casor, one of his indentured servants.  Instead Johnson told Casor he was extending his indenture time. Casor was apparently sure Johnson couldn’t legally take such a position or enforce it because he left the Johnson place in search of employment elsewhere. A white man named Robert Parker must have thought the same thing, because he provided Casor employment.



In all likelihood after several threats (no-one among the living today knows), Anthony Johnson brought suit against Robert Parker in the Court of Northampton late that same year. In 1655, the court ruled for unknown reasons that Anthony Johnson could hold John Casor indefinitely as his indentured Servant.  With this action, the Northampton Colonial Virginia Court inadvertently performed two seemingly benign deeds: The first gave judicial sanction for free blacks to own slaves of their own race and second, John Casor became the second lifetime slave held in the English Colonies; in this way, historical court records shown the first black slave owner in Colonial Virginia was Anthony Johnson.



Nevertheless, it wasn’t until 1670 that a law was passed permitting folks to legally hold a black servant for an indefinite period of time as a slave. You see, in that year, the Colonial Assembly passed legislation granting free whites, blacks, and Native Americans the right to own blacks as slaves.



Within less than 30 years (1699), the large number of free blacks prompted fears of a “slave uprising.” So the Province of Virginia ordered the expulsion of freed blacks, which in other words, provided a one way ticket to Africa. Surprisingly records show that many blacks sold themselves to whites so they wouldn’t be required to go to Africa. This was the first attempt to “gently” repatriate (send back) free blacks to the region commonly perceived to be the black man’s homeland; in fact the modern nations of Sierra Leone and Liberia originated as colonies of deported x-black slaves.


Common sense suggests that further “cultivation” of the slave business was anything but wise, nevertheless, America’s slave owners (black and white) continued to thrive; this was especially so in the South.  By 1830 there were 3,775 black families living in the South who owned black slaves. 30 years latter (1860) there were approximately 3,000 black slaves owned by black families just within the city of New Orleans.



In many instances, black slave owners had similar views regarding slavery with their white counterparts. Slave owners of both races occasionally freed a trusted servant but were just as apt to sell a less fortunate slave the very next day. The act of freeing one or several slaves while others remained in bondage did not establish a firm commitment against slavery, but promoted the personal view that some actions by slaves, such as hard work or the display of loyalty, occasionally warranted them their freedom, while others were clearly meant to be slaves until their demise.



As mentioned earlier, John Casor was once thought to be the first documented slave in America when in actuality it was John Punch. He was bound as an indentured servant for life in 1640 (a full 15 years before Casor) after trying to escape from his indenture, or his “master”.



His story is as follows: John Punch was an indentured servant of a Virginia planter known as Hugh Gwyn; he escaped to Maryland in the company of two other servants, one was a Dutchman, the other a Scot.  All three men were caught and sentenced to whippings; in addition the two European men were sentenced to have their terms of indenture extended by four years each.  On the other hand the punishment for John Punch was much more severe than that given to two white indentured servants, which has led historians to call Punch the first African documented to be legally sanctioned as a slave for life in Virginia.  Anthony Johnson remains the first Black man to own a slave for life in America and the second slave owner.



There is only one “rewarding” turn of events that could possibly be associated with the first full-fledged slave (John Punch):  In July of 2012, Ancestry.com issued a paper verifying that with the combination of historic research and Y-DNA analysis, the evidence that’s key to proving ancestral links or kinship, concluding that Punch was an eleventh-generation maternal grandfather of President Barack Obama.





Sources:

http://blackinformant.wordpress.com/2005/02/28/more-buried-history-black-slave-owners-in-the-us/                                                                                                                            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Punch_%28slave%29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Casor                                                                                                                        http://cofcc.org/2012/03/americas-first-slave-owner-was-a-black-man/ http://ultimatehistoryproject.com/emancipation.html





13 comments:

  1. I know this web page offers quality based articles and additional data, is there any other
    web page which gives these stuff in quality?

    my blog gratis spiele
    Also see my website > gratis spiele

    ReplyDelete
  2. Very interesting. I think it's funny that blacks in this country try to place the blame of slavery entirely on white people. They don't want to admit they had a part in it too.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's in fact very complicated in this busy life to listen news on TV, so I just use internet for that reason, and get the newest information.

    Here is my page - Health And Fitness: Widely used Diets Article Category | Social Bookmarking Greece

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think that everything published was very reasonable. However, think
    on this, suppose you were to create a killer title?
    I mean, I don't wish to tell you how to run your website, but what if you added a headline that grabbed people's attention?
    I mean "Was The First American Slave Owner a Black Man?" is
    kinda vanilla. You should glance at Yahoo's home page and watch how they write article titles to get people interested. You might try adding a video or a picture or two to get people excited about everything've got to
    say. In my opinion, it might bring your website a little bit
    more interesting.

    Feel free to surf to my webpage; home workout routines for women

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'm really enjoying the design and layout of your site. It's a very easy
    on the eyes which makes it much more pleasant for me to come here and visit
    more often. Did you hire out a designer to create your theme?
    Exceptional work!

    Also visit my website - sticky21.blinkweb.com

    ReplyDelete
  6. Having read this I thought it was extremely enlightening.
    I appreciate you spending some time and energy to put
    this article together. I once again find myself spending way too much
    time both reading and posting comments. But so what, it was still
    worth it!

    Also visit my webpage; best hair loss products

    ReplyDelete
  7. You ought to take part in a contest for one of the highest quality websites on the net.
    I am going to recommend this blog!

    my blog post; Wiki Backlinks

    ReplyDelete
  8. You have made some good points there. I looked on the web to learn more
    about the issue and found most individuals will go along
    with your views on this website.

    Also visit my page - muscle building supplements for seniors

    ReplyDelete
  9. Pretty! This has been a really wonderful post. Many thanks for providing
    this info.

    Also visit my web-site :: home remodeling in sumner

    ReplyDelete
  10. You can definitely see your expertise within the article you write.
    The arena hopes for even more passionate writers such as you who aren't afraid to say how they believe. Always follow your heart.

    My blog post Muscle BUilding Supplement

    ReplyDelete
  11. Excellent goods from you, man. I have understand your stuff prior to
    and you are just too great. I actually like what you've received right here, really like what you're stating and
    the best way wherein you say it. You're making it enjoyable and you still take care of to stay it sensible. I can not wait to learn far more from you. This is actually a great website.

    Here is my homepage; home income profit system

    ReplyDelete
  12. You have me more confused now after reading your article than I was before I read it. I was aware of all contained in it. You confused me when you wrote that the ex slaves were repatriated to Africa. Did you mean to write that the indentured slaves who worked off their contracts were sent back to Africa? In my opinion, These are the types of mistakes that cause the most damage to the truth and understanding of our history. I think I would favor an out right lie.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Perhaps you refer to paragraph 6 . . . If so, I certainly didn’t intend to suggest that indentured slaves who worked off their contracts were sent back to Africa, because as I’m sure you are aware, most indentured slaves were not from Africa in the first place.

      Further, the phrase ‘the first attempt to “gently” repatriate free blacks to the region commonly perceived to be the black man’s homeland’ is not intended to imply that all freed slaves, black or white, were sent to Africa.

      Delete