For the past 30+ years “digital” has become an unparalleled buzzword in the music industry. Many children think that LP’s are just some kind of an oversized CD. All of us who back in the day had even marginally decent turntables complimented with a good set of speakers can share stories about our first exposure to CD's; we all thought they would be better than LP’s and with the purchase of our first rather expensive CD player, most of us ran right out to buy a CD.
With excitement
building, the big moment finally arrived ...we pressed play and about 30 seconds
later, with this odd new sound coming from the speakers, we instantly concluded
that we must have done something wrong during the installation process and in
turn carefully checked all the connections and such to the new CD player. Following
a failed attempt to improve the sound output, we then concluded the player was surely defective so we called a friend who also had a new CD player and borrowed
it, the same damn results followed!
This thin dry and super clean sound just wasn’t doing anything
right for many of us; but this experience was, as it turned out, our very first encounter with
what is now called “ear fatigue”.
In
the years to follow there was a great deal of pressure placed on manufacturers to improve the performance level or perhaps it’s more appropriate to say “make
good on their claims”. Yes, many aspects of the CD player’s design have
improved, but some parts have actually gotten worse. During the 30 years that have passed, many “older”
listeners have simply forgotten the genuine difference in sound between the LP
and the CD and have adjusted our hearing and expectations to a lower level. Admittedly
the CD does have good points, but most are related to engineering and
industrial design rather than fidelity.
To remotely understand how an LP or CD actually works from a very
simplistic point of view, it’s necessary to recognize that a vinyl record is an
analog recording, and CD's are digital recordings. Original sound is analog by definition. A
digital recording takes “snapshots” of the analog signal at a certain rate (for CD's it's 44,100 times per second) and measures each snapshot with a high
degree of accuracy.
The fact is that no matter how you put it, this means that a
digital recording is not capturing the complete sound wave; instead it’s
approximating the sound wave with a series of steps. Some sounds that have very
quick transitions, such as a drum beat or that of a trumpet’s tone for example; this will be distorted when converted to digital because they change too quickly.
In the typical home
stereo system, the CD player takes this digital recording and converts it back to an analog signal,
which is fed to the amplifier. The amplifier then raises the voltage of the
signal to a level powerful enough to make the speakers work.
On the other hand a vinyl record has a groove “carved” or “cut” into
it that mirrors the original sound’s waveform; this means that absolutely no
information / signal is lost, so in short, since the output of a LP or record
player is analog, it can be fed directly to your amplifier with no conversion, thus no signal is lost and
because of this, a better sound results.
However
it should be noted that to have a direct analog (LP) playback system that is noticeably
superior to a modern digital (CD) playback system requires a large monetary investment
in the analog system or let’s say a delicate balance of “gear” with a proper
setup is essential. . .
This might include: Speakers, single ended triode amplifiers
with no feedback, a single ended triode preamplifier, a good MC cartridge (the “needle”)
with a step-up transformer, a good tone arm, and a good turntable with good wire.
If anything in the above list is weak, the illusion will simply collapse.
In the long and short of all things being considered here, unless
you can create the LP playback system quite similar to the one described in the
above paragraph, then what’s the point in piddling with LP’s in the first place,
especially these days. Truth is if you’re going to do vinyl, there are no short
cuts. While it’s possible to create the ideal audio illusion with a not so modest
$2,000.00, you must be practical and careful in choosing the components. However that $2,000.00 is likely to surpass
the price of a good digital-to-analog converter (DAC) or to put it more
plainly, a good CD player.
For the difference
in sound it’s often argued that the rewards of the LP are obvious beyond cost. But keep in mind that there are downsides to LP’s such as tiny specks of dust that often collect on the disc or minor damage
to the disc can be “heard” or “amplified” as noise or static, thus sabotaging the concept of a
better, wholesome sound. During quiet spots in songs this may be “heard” or “amplified”
as a “crackling” noise; if the digital recording contains silence, then there’s
only silence heard on the CD. Further, digital recordings don’t degrade over time, and finally CD’s can hold 74
minutes of music; LP’s don’t even come close, with about 20 minutes per side.
To take the sound / fidelity issue one step further, there is
the response from the masses who never owned a high quality turntable set-up
that can justifiably argue that when compared
to the cassette tape player, that was once the rage, CD’s actually do sound lots better.
Regardless,
according to Rolling Stone Magazine, sales of vinyl albums continue to grow,
setting a new record in 2010, in fact as early as April of 2008 C/Net
reported that LP sales surpassed CD sales, but does vinyl really reproduce sound that much better, or is this just an extended trend?
The Compact Disc was introduced in 1983, and three years later
CD sales outsold LP’s, but since CD’s sold for $15.00 to $17.00, twice the
price of an LP at the time, a lot of buyers resisted the changeover from analog
to digital. Today, as you might guess, the opposite is true.
Sources: http://www.decware.com/paper20.htm
http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/question487.htm http://www.prodvd.com.br/vinil_k7_cd.php
http://www.npr.org/2012/02/10/146697658/why-vinyl-sounds-better-than-cd-or-not
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13645_3-9906397-47.html
I had no idea. I love how you explain this scientifically so us young-uns can understand the reasoning. If you'd said to me yesterday, "I thought LPs sounded better than CDs", I'd have scoffed. But now I get it! Wow.
ReplyDeleteThis was an issue for the early CD players, but most of us think the more recent models do a much better job with sound output. On the other hand, maybe we’ve simply forgotten.
ReplyDeleteI still like to listen to my old LPs. Most of them still sound pretty good. A few of them have scratches, but I still like them better than the CDs. The biggest problem I've found is finding good replacement needles for the turntable.
ReplyDeleteI just couldn't go away your site before suggesting that I really enjoyed the standard info an individual supply in your guests? Is going to be back often in order to investigate cross-check new posts
ReplyDeleteMy page : Grow tent
I like the helpful information you provide in your articles.
ReplyDeleteI will bookmark your blog and check again here regularly.
I'm quite certain I'll learn many new stuff right here!
Good luck for the next!
my web site: brother and sister quotes