Lookalikes?
Dad often told the story of being severely beaten late one night by
several patrons of a small Paris tavern he frequented during his “tour of duty”
in WWII torn France. He always insisted
the aggressors were certain he was a local Frenchman who had established the reputation
of “small time swindler” who had somehow duped quite a few local Frenchmen (while
dressed as an American ‘GI’ no less) into giving him their hard earned Franc’s.
A sad circumstance he learned some weeks
after he recovered from his most unusually cruel thrashing.
In truth, I found Dad’s story of ‘mistaken identity’
a bit far fetched during my youth, but then, to my surprise, I encountered a
similar case of ‘mistaken identity’ years later. However on this particular occasion absolutely
no form of hostility transpired. While
purchasing a quick lunch at a local “KFC” establishment as a
very young adult, I was approached by a duo of similarly young adults for a personnel
autograph. You see, they were convinced that
I was the “drummer” for the musical group whose concert they had attended the evening
prior.
My denial of being said individual or even ‘knowing of’ said person
only resulted in reassuring the young couple they were not mistaken. Needless to say, I soon recognized the
futility of continuing to forswear the accusation, so ever so reluctantly I granted
their request; however I was steadfast in refusing to add the post script, “drummer—Pink Floyd” to my autograph.
We all know about Mistaken Identity when it’s
used as a defense in sayyy ‘criminal law’; in such cases, the innocence of the accused
or evidence of guilt are often times undermined by asserting that an eyewitness
to the crime incorrectly thought that they saw the defendant, when in fact the
person alleged seen by the witness was in fact someone else.
Genetic fingerprinting and DNA evidence is now commonplace; because
of this, many convictions based on the testimony of eyewitnesses are being
re-examined. Based upon recent statistics, more than 75% of the cases of DNA
exonerations encompass erroneous eyewitness identification or ‘mistaken identity’.
Abraham Lincoln was successful in using mistaken
identity in his defense of accused murder William “Duff” Armstrong in 1858. By
using a Farmer’s Almanac Lincoln argued that a witness could
not have possibly recognized Armstrong in the moonlight, since the position of
the moon (according to the almanac) on the night in question would not have
provided sufficient illumination.
A famous case of mistaken identity in the United Kingdom is the
case of Adolf Beck; in March of 1898 he was convicted and served seven years in
prison as a swindler; Beck was released upon completion of his 7 year term, and
then arrested again on the same charges before the actual swindler (a fellow by
the name of John Smith) of similar appearance was arrested for the same offence.
In 1984, Ms. Jennifer
Thompson was raped. During the attack, Ms. Thompson later insisted that she was
able to study the attacker’s face during the ordeal, with hopes of identifying him
if she managed to survive the attack. Police investigators presented her with a
photo lineup and Ms. Thompson identified Ronald Cotton as her attacker. Twice,
she testified against him, even though she had visited Bobby Poole, an incarcerated
man who had boasted to fellow inmates that he had committed the crimes for
which Cotton was ultimately convicted. Ronald Cotton serving 10.5 years of his
sentence before DNA evidence conclusively proved that Poole was indeed the
rapist; a charge to which he pleaded guilty.
Jennifer Thompson
has since become a critic of the reliability of eyewitness testimony. Upon
release, Ronald Cotton was awarded a $110,000 payment from the State of North
Carolina, for compensation. Cotton and Thompson have since reconciled and
become close friends; as a team, they tour the US in support of eyewitness
testimony reform. Bobby Poole died in prison in 2000.
Such occurrences of
mistaken identity it turns out are not that unusual; I have stumbled-up-on an
unusual case of mistaken identity of a more recent date that’s unrelated to the
various court systems, which you may think is down-right intriguing:
On April 26, 2006 two young
college girls were among the students traveling with a group from Taylor
University (located in Upland, Indiana, USA). The students were involved in a violent crash
in northern Indiana; a tractor-trailer slammed into the van they were riding in,
killing five passengers.
19 year old Whitney Cerak and 22 year old Laura
VanRyn looked a lot alike. So much alike, that the coroner investigating the
traffic accident confused the one who died, with the one who lived.
Whitney’s family was told she was among the dead; they held a
closed-casket funeral that attended by no less than 1,400 family members and friends. Laura VanRyn’s family was told that their
daughter was alive; in intensive care and in a coma-like state.
The VanRyn’s
family, stayed by the injured young woman’s bedside for weeks. They posted a Web
log detailing her recovery; it detailed the many small steps they believed
their daughter was making, such as playing the game Connect Four and feeding
herself applesauce.
On a Monday, the VanRyns
reported: “While certain things seem to be coming back to her, she still has
times where she’ll say things that don’t make much sense.” Shortly thereafter (5 weeks after the
accident) the VanRyns learned why: The recovering patient wasn’t their
daughter. She was 19 year old Ms. Whitney Cerak.
Sources:
http://roflrazzi.cheezburger.com/totallylookslike/page/19
http://www.taylor.edu/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mistaken_identity
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-06-01-vanryn-cerak-cover_x.htm?csp=22_dmr