Sunday, May 15, 2022

The Cost of War: A World  Food Crisis on the Horizon


Ukraine is the second largest country in Europe, after Russia

 

Ukraine’s Tradition of Exports . . . Due to its expansive fertile lands, prior to the ongoing war with Russia (the Russo-Ukrainian War), Ukraine was one of the largest grain exporters in the world.   A Russian Blockade in the Black Sea insures that Ukraine will export no-more!             

 

Ukraine was among the world’s top agricultural producers and exporters  and was often described as the “bread basket of Europe”. As was evidenced during the 2020/21 international wheat marketing season (July-June), when it ranked as the world’s sixth largest wheat exporter, accounting for nine percent of wheat trade, world wide.

 

The country was also a major global exporter of maize (corn), barley and rapeseed (oil-seed). In 2020/21, it accounted for 12% of global trade in maize and barley and 14% of world rapeseed exports.

 

Ukraine’s trade share was even larger in sunflower-oil production, accounting for about 50% of the world’s exports in 2020 & 2021.

 

However, aside from the growing loss of lives and the ever increasing humanitarian needs, the likely disruptions caused by the Russo-Ukrainian War to Ukraine’s grain and oil-seed sectors are sure to change all that!

This, coupled with potential food and fertilizer export difficulties encountered by the Russian Federation resulting from economic sanctions by many western countries, is sure to jeopardize the food security of many countries, particularly those that have become dependent upon Ukraine and the Russian Federation for their food and fertilizer imports. For example Eritrea, a small country near the Horn of Africa region of Eastern Africa, purchased 47% of its wheat imports in 2021 from Ukraine. Yeah, the other 53%, came from the Russian Federation.

 

Overall, more than 30 nations depend on Ukraine and or the Russian Federation for over 30 percent of their imported wheat and fertilizer needs; many of which are located in South America, North Africa, and in Western and Central Asia.

 

The invasion of Ukraine will likely disrupt the global fertilizer trade especially since Russia is the world’s largest exporter of fertilizers. A few of the primary importers of fertilizers from Russia include Brazil (21%), China (10%), the US (9%), and India (4%).


Based upon the chart displayed above, Brazil may see severe economic effects since Brazil imports more than 85% of its fertilizers.  Fertilizer supplies in the US may be less of an issue since the US, unlike Brazil, which met slightly more than 4% of the country´s demand in 2020, has strong domestic fertilizer production capabilities. Still, US farmers are likely to see higher fertilizer prices because of the interconnection of the global fertilizer trade industry.

 

And too, because the US and Brazil are the top global exporters of many agricultural commodities, vegetable shoppers in the US and beyond, are sure to see higher prices in the marketplace.  

 

The good news, by now, grocery shoppers everywhere, are sure to be accustomed to run-a-way inflationary prices created by the ongoing COVID Pandemic “recovery”! Sooo, as the Aussies say, no worries, Huh?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sources:

https://www.19fortyfive.com/2022/03/russia-offers-to-end-war-if-ukraine-agrees-to-be-a-puppet-state/ 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukraine#Agriculture 

https://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/2022/03/war-in-ukraine-and-its-effect-on-fertilizer-exports-to-brazil-and-the-us.html#:~:text=Brazil%20imports%2095%25%20of%20its,the%20country%C2%B4s%20demand 


 

Monday, September 3, 2018

A Boogeyman Event!



Is it all just another bad dream?

Ahhh, the 21st Century; isn’t it a great era to be a part of and in which to live! To be perfectly honest, you’d easily admit, another fantastic gadget seems to enter the market place on a monthly basis these days . . .

With this pleasant thought still lingering in the recesses of your mind, you silently give thanks that you finally invested in that “smarter phone” that became available early last week.

This evening’s planed events may even justify its purchase. Well, it’s not limited to just making calls from most any locality to anywhere in the world, hell, it can take pictures, and forward them to “friends” of choice, it allows the viewing of movies, listening to music or reading the latest novel; it’s a pocket calculator, it makes a good flashlight in a pinch, it grants access to the world wide web, but best of all it will present verbal turn-by-turn directions to within 3 feet of a friends front door step, using satellite GPS coordinates . . . Sooo, this evening while in-route, you’ll “Google” dinning reservations with that new up-scale Dinning Theater you heard about for tomorrow evening (of course, by way of the smarter phone); just for the two of you, and with that same “cell phone” you’ll call ahead and ask your friend to “prepare” / “set” the dinning table because you also ordered your favorite meal for two - via the local on-line GrubHub service; with guaranteed delivery to your friends place later this evening.  

Finally, upon reaching you destination, your late-model car’s “Mystery Lady” warns you it’s still 91° outside the temperature controlled environs of your auto; it’s then, you decide that it is a good idea to notify your “friend” that you have arrived (again, via your smarter phone) and you’re especially glad you did because when you exit the car (with smarter phone safely stored in your pocket) you’re taken aback by the extreme humidity as and the excessive heat, meaning “Mystery Lady” was only half right about the environment beyond the car’s interior . . . You can’t help but briefly hope that the main entry door opens during your brief approach, as the relative humidity (RH) must be near 95% and it really is quite stifling to  breath - fantastic, the front door is opening!    

Upon entering the confines of the elegantly styled home you quickly recover your shortness of breath in the perfectly balanced / conditioned atmosphere . . . Obviously, the handy work of a modern cooling system. From the front door’s entryway you note the electric “candles” strategically placed upon the “setting for two” dinning table, located just beyond the compact yet plush “living” area.

Since this was your first visit to this friends new abode, per request, you perform a standard “look-about” . . . A “ceremony” that will require complimentary acknowledgments of the many tasteful appliances and equally convenient gadgets strategically located throughout the home. Aside from the perfectly performing AC system, this includes (to name the most obvious), such modern house-hold basics as the 60 inch TV entertainment center complimented by the classic soft / dim lighting arrangement in the living area; there’s an extra wide refrigerator-freezer, a fully electric range-top & oven island, a microwave, a garbage compactor, a built-in Dish Washer, and a triple-tubed kitchen sink with near instant access to hot water with an attached disposal unit - all in the Kitchen Area.  When exiting the domain of the kitchen, a short hall opens to the right; within a few feet, again on the right, a door-way opens the into a large combined Half Bath and Laundry Room fitted with a stacked “HE” washer/ Dryer set; the room appears to lead outside into a small but amply fenced back yard fitted with a miniature, somewhat attractive, cascading water display of some sort. Across the hall opposite the Half Bath and Laundry Room entrance is an informal Study / Office Area, with what appears to be a state-of-the-art Apple PC with a matching printer. The short hall way ends with a doorway leading into a rather large Master Bedroom and Master Bath . . . The bedroom is equipped with yet another wide screen TV and a compact sound system that is emitting a soft pleasant tune; just beyond the King bed there is another exit onto a wooden deck which boasts what appears to be a 2-person hot-tub.  In other words, most all the conveniences of a typical modern home . . . Hardly any of which will work without electricity!            

Within 15 minutes beyond the “tour”, GrubHub’s service “shines” as you evening meal arrives right on time . . . The environment, in a word, is simply “perfect” . . . Then, within a blink of the eye the electric “candles” loose their soft glow, the music streaming from the Master bedroom is suddenly silent and the time display on the kitchen Microwave is now pitch black!  Your heart rate speeds a bit and in the dead silence - you can actually hear you friend breathing.   Instinctively checking your smarter phone for the exact time; surprise, surprise, it too is dead!   
    
Sooo, were you and what were you doing when the Catastrophic event occurred (most likely it was a Nuclear Electromagnetic Pulse or EMP)? Yes, you’d heard there was considerable risk that it was going to happen; political hacks have been predicting it for months; most said it was only a matter of time. Okay, so now that it has happened, just how long will the “Power” be off and what, again, is an EMP?   

Well, first, an Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) is a very concentrated burst of electromagnetic (EM) energy caused by a sudden or rapid acceleration or surge of charged particles. A common example is a lightning strike; occasionally such events (lightning strikes) give rise to short term localized electrical current disruptions in nearby electrical grids. Such current surges can damage sensitive hardware within your home such as unshielded (absent surge protectors) computers, TV’s, Radios, and similar electronic appliances.  

A less common but much, much more destructive EMP occurs following the detonation of a hydrogen bomb at a high altitude; such an event would generate a powerful EMP over a large geographic area. In the simplest of terms, pure chaos is suddenly the way of life! Yep, this means sudden death to that new smarter cell phone you just bought and the land line too; your TV’s, radio’s, and computer’s - all dead. Then it gets worse as all airborne planes simply fall from the sky while trains, and automobiles, so dependant upon electric circuitry, in best case scenarios, ‘slow’ to a stop, rather than ‘crash to a stop’, because of all the tiny “fried” computer circuitry built into such common modes of transportation.  
     
Yep, the electrical grid has been “fried” as they say; sooo, count on it taking months or years to get the power back on. Okay, now may be a good time to take a look-see at the drawing displayed below:
A high altitude blast (detonation at saaay, 300 miles above the Earth’s surface) will create a pulse that will nearly cover a 1500 mile radius, disabling the entire U S electrical grid, plus, most of Canada’s and Mexico’s.

Yep, that means no refrigeration, no A/C or heat, no lights, no phones (cells or land-lines) or internet communications.  No computers or computer based gadgets of any sort (even simple hand-held calculators), no access to your bank funds and very shortly no running water.  It will literally send folks back to the dark-ages, and most wouldn’t know how to survive for more than just a few days. In fact, studies predict that 9 out of 10 Americans will die within two years following an EMP as described above; millions will die in just the first few weeks and as many as 500,000 folks will die within the first hour or two.
  
That’s right, a major EMP strike will shut down US power for up to 10 years. The entire grid will have to be rebuilt. To fix it, the U S will have to spend over Two (2) Trillion Dollars within the first year or so. 

First, and most critical, will be the thousands of either ‘pole mounted’ or ‘ground based’ transformers that’s used to make up the vast majority of the U S electrical subsystem; you see, they insure the grid’s day to day uninterrupted operation.

Damaged transformers, such as those usually seen on poles or inside fenced lots can usually be repaired or replaced quickly if necessary and the good news is that they do currently have built in protection in case of a surge such as a localized lighting strike.  However, they do have limits, just like the ugly little surge protector you use for your computer. So, if the grid transformers were in proximity of the detonation point of the recent high altitude EMP burst, most failed; totally!

Sense dozens, no, hundreds or even thousands of these transformers have been destroyed, electricity providers and their repairmen are going to have the near impossible task of locating and installing all the “back-up” or replacement transformers needed. Scores will require being shipped from around the world and that will take time - and keep in mind, just communicating such needs will be no small task . . . And too, when they finally arrive, transporting the replacement transformers to the “failed sites” becomes a problem as all those handy service trucks with the convenient “electric over hydraulic lifts” remain in ruins, but replacement units from the three European manufactures are suppose to be in route.


Beyond the basics of finding ample food clothing and shelter, if you want to survive the aftermath of the EMP, most experts strongly suggest you get creative and dig up gadgets, appliances, or vehicles built back in the 1960s or earlier; as they will have likely survived the EMP event . . . You might want to know there are a few notable exceptions in the automobile line though; for example the 1984 Chevrolet Blazer, the 1983 Ford Bronco, 1979 Jeep CJ5’s, or the 1972 Volkswagen Beetle should have survived too. Of course, just as difficult as finding one of these “beauties” in running condition, will be finding an ample fuel supply and perhaps just as important, a parts supply for your ‘new’ EMP “resident” mode of transportation . . . Now you know why you neighbor, ole man Buccus, took so long and spent so much on restoring that ‘56 Willies with only genuine 50’ era parts!

To make matters worse, this whole EMP thing has left the country susceptible to a mainland attack by just about any ambitious contemporary nation who has looked upon our society / civilization with a reproachful eye. You see, with our Humvees, helicopters, missiles, jets,  ships and submarines out of commission - we will be at a huge disadvantage . . . Thank goodness, a few hundred were stationed well beyond the EMP event but they have been extremely slow in arriving from their assigned bases beyond the Continental U S.  Local rumor has it that they’re awaiting direct orders from “High Command” 

Now for the last of the really bad news: All of this disarray could have been avoided! That’s right, for a mere Two (2) Billion Dollars, the Government could have retrofitted most of the grid with protection against an EMP blast / pulse - now if you’ve been paying attention, compare that to the Two (2) Trillion Dollars someone is going to have to “cough-up” within the next 12 months to get things on the road to recovery.  Well yeah, Two (2) Billion Dollars is a lot of money, but comparatively it’s one tenth of one percent (0.1%) of the Two (2) Trillion Dollars that will be spent within the first year of many years to come . . . Oh, you might also want to know that U S Governments receivables in 2017 (well before all this happened) was a modest 3.6 Trillion Dollars. 

Despite how unlikely it was that this would ever happen, our government has failed us all; completely!




Sources: 
https://www.survivalsullivan.com/day-electronics-died-happens-emp/ 
http://www.askaprepper.com/affordable-vehicles-can-survive-emp/ 

Saturday, December 23, 2017

TIME . . .


Time is one of the countless mysteries of the universe. Mankind is swept up in the river of time against his will and often against better judgement especially when viewed from a distance.  For example, sometime during the early 400’s; Church theologian, Saint Augustine of Hippo (about 354 — 430 AD) wrote at length about the puzzling nature of time: “How can the past and future be, when the past no longer is, and the future is not yet? As for the present, if it were always present and never moved on to become the past, it would not be time, but eternity.”   By taking Saint Augustine's logic a bit further, we could actually determine that time is simply not a possibility since the past has departed, the future does not physically exist, and the present occurs only for an instant.  

Some 1200 years later in 1600, the former Dominican monk and philosopher Giordano Bruno was burned alive in downtown Rome. So as to insure his humiliation, the “Church” first hung him upside down for a good while after striping him naked . . . What made the teachings of Bruno so perilous in the view of the “Church”? He had asked a simple question: “Is there life in outer space?” Rather than contemplate the possibility of other saints, popes, and churches existing somewhere out there in the heavens, it made more sense to the “Church” to simply burn him for “heresy”.

For more than 400 years the memory of Bruno has haunted historians, especially those of science. In any event, Bruno’s vindication has been late in coming, in that every few weeks or so (about twice a month) a new planet is discovered orbiting a distant star; to date, more than 250 such planets have now been documented. Never-the-less, one big question lingers:  Although the Milky Way is teaming with extrasolar planets, how many of them can and do support intelligent life?  And if such life exists out there, what can science say with certainly about it?

Many people claim that extraterrestrials visit Earth routinely in the form of UFOs. Yet, Scientists frequently dismiss the likelihood of UFOs being from distance stars due to the vast distance between them (distant stars) and Earth.

Regardless, the most believable circumstances of UFOs involve:
A. Multiple sightings by independent, credible eyewitnesses and
B. Evidence from multiple sources, such as eyesight coupled with radar. 
To the chagrin of multiple UFO event researchers such cases occur habitually. However what‘s so frustrating to investigating scientists is that, of the hundreds of recorded sightings, none have yet produced hard physical evidence that can lead to reproducible results in the laboratory such as alien DNA or an alien computer chip.

Characteristics of such credible UFO sightings that have been recorded by observers include:
          a)  The ability to zig-zag in midair;
b) The curious habit of stopping car ignitions and disrupting electrical power;
c) The ability to hover silently.

None of these characteristics fit the description of the rockets mankind has developed here on Earth. Most importantly because all known rockets depend on Newton’s third law of motion (for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction); yet the UFOs that meet the criteria cited above do not appear to expel an exhaust plume. And the g-forces created by zig-zagging flying saucers are believed to exceed 100 times the gravitational force of Earth—so; simply put, the g-forces would be enough to flatten any creature of Earth.

Because of such unexplainable mysteries, a more sensible accounting of such undeniable events may best be explained by Travelers of Time!

In 1990, Stephen Hawking, the renowned British scientist, professor, and author who has done groundbreaking work in physics and cosmology, was at best skeptical about time travel; in fact he suggested “there ought to be a law, making time travel impossible”. At the time, perhaps lightheartedly, he also proposed a ‘Chronology Protection Conjecture’ to ban time travel from the laws of physics in order to “make history safe for historians”.

The awkward thing, however, is that no matter how hard physicists try, they can’t find a law that prevents time travel. Actually, time travel is consistent with the known laws of physics.   Sooo, it comes of little surprise that Hawkins, unable to find any physical law that makes time travel impossible, recently changed his mind. He made the evening news when he said, “Time travel may be possible, but it is not practical.”
                                                                             
Fact is, time travel into the future is not only possible it has been experimentally confirmed hundreds of times.  For example, if an astronaut were to travel near the speed of light, it will take him only a single minute to reach the nearest star in our Milky Way; however, four years would have elapsed on Earth, but for him, only one minute would have passed, because time would have slowed down inside his space craft. Therefore he would have travelled four years into the future, as experienced on Earth. (Tactically, Earth astronauts take a short trip into the future every time they go into outer space. You see, they travel at about 18,000 miles per hour when orbiting the Earth so their clocks tick a tiny bit slower than clocks on Earth.) Thus, proving that a time machine capable of taking us into the future is consistent with Einstein’s theory of relativity.

That said, the big problem is, yes — going back in time!

If mankind were to journey into the past, based upon our current knowledge of the laws of physics, history would be impossible to write. As soon as a historian recorded our past, someone could go back and alter it. Not only would time machines put historians out of business, they would enable us to change the course of time whenever we wanted. History could easily become a never-ending, madcap crazy episode, as tourists from the future ran trodden over historic events while trying to insure a good camera shot.

Perhaps the thorniest problem to overcome would be the logical paradoxes raised by time travel into the past. For example, what would happen if we killed our mother and father before we are born? This is a logical impossibility; typically called the “grandfather paradox”.

Fortunately there are at least three known hypothetical ways to resolve such paradoxes:
First, you unwittingly repeat past history as it is written when you go back in time, therefore always fulfilling the past. In other words, you have no “free will” in which case you are forced to complete the past as it is written. Consequently, if you travel back into the past to give the secret of time travel to your younger self, then it was simply meant to happen that way; if the secret of time travel came from the future, that’s okay, it was destiny!

Second, you have free will, so you can change the past, but only within certain limits. In short, your “free will” cannot create a time paradox. If you tried to kill your parents before you are born, a cryptic force would prevent you from performing the deed . . . Kind of like trying to walk on the ceiling; there is a law preventing all of us from doing so, even though we might want to. Meaning, there is a law preventing us from killing our parents before we are born.

Third, the universe simply splits into multiple worlds. On one timeline the people whom you killed may look just like your parents, but they are different, because you are now in a parallel universe. This possibility is most consistent with the quantum mechanics (CLICK HERE for more detailed information published back in 2011).

This theory can be clarified a bit by drawing a straight line on a blackboard, representing the timeline of our universe . . . Then draw a another line which splits off the first line; the second line represents a parallel world that opens up when you alter the past — the single timeline becomes two timelines.  This means that paradoxes resulting from time-travel can be resolved. So, if you killed your parents before you were born, it simply means you killed some nice couple who were genetically identical to your parents, with the same memories and personalities, but they were not actually your real parents.

Sooo, next time you or someone you know, encounters an unexplainable UFO  . . . Before dismissing it as just another crazy anomaly, you might first consider the notion that “aliens” really do exist, but they are likely our own descendants from many thousands of years into the future. And too, in such cases the UFO’s occupants may or may not technically be of extraterrestrial origin, if only because some of our indeterminably distant grandchildren may well be born on a planet far, far away!



Sources:


Friday, September 29, 2017

Problems Ahead:

 Rumors of War, Inclement Weather, & Universal Health Care



The time is near when the United States must rethink how her great wealth is dispersed. Rumors of war, ever increasing inclement weather events that end in devastation, and a citizenry that recognizes the need, no, the right, for universal health care for all Americans are perhaps the critical issues that will finally force the US to recognize and fulfill the long standing need to rethink and adjust her annual budget expenditures.

To borrow the popular phrase “we’ve kicked the can to the end of the road” best describes the dilemma we currently face with North Korea. 

Attempts to convince the world that activities of man are increasing the earth’s temperature, resulting in global warming have failed miserably!  This dismal failure assures the increase in severe inclement weather events in the future and the gradual rise in sea levels not just nationwide, but worldwide! This will soon require large scale fortification or even the relocation of major US coastal cities such as New York, New Orleans, Huston, Miami, Boston, and Tampa Bay.

There’s more — ice sheets that are melting in Antarctica will bash California with an even greater sea-level rise than the rest of the world’s average; threatening the state’s famous beaches and infrastructure.  The most recent scientific monitoring results show that the rate of ice loss / melt from Antarctica and Greenland is increasing and because of how the Earth rotates coupled with the moons gravitational pull on the oceans, well, it’s really bad news for the entire California Coast line.

For far too long, the US has out-spent the rest of the world in building and maintaining a military machine that is unmatched anywhere on earth. Yet, we continue to see headlines such as the one declaring: “Pentagon buries evidence of $125 Billion in bureaucratic waste”.  Turns out the internal report, issued in January of 2015, identified “a clear path” for the Defense Department to save $125 billion over five years. 

Perhaps the biggest story is that the Pentagon attempted to hide the report’s findings amid fears that Congress would use the results as justification for slashing the defense budget.  

Just for the purpose of comparison; North Korea’s 2017 military budget is estimated to total 7.5 Billion Dollars, Russia’s military budget for 2017 is 69 Billion Dollars, China’s military Budget for 2017 is 215 Billion Dollars — these three potential US military adversaries combined, spent less than half of US expenditures for 2017 which eclipses all others with a military budget of 602.8 Billion Dollars—a sum that does not include expenditures for Veterans Affairs and Foreign Aid (which adds more than 231 Billion Dollars to the total)! Check-out the Budget Comparison Chart Below:  

If not for the extraordinary Atlantic hurricane season, of late (summer 2017), all eyes would be on Guam, a US territory in the western Pacific; with a population of less than 163,000 souls, all contained within an area of 210 sq miles (544 sq km). Stationed on the island are 3,831 US military personnel who control much of the island, including Anderson Air Force Base which hosts B52 bombers and fighter jets. The Island is reportedly referred to by many US commanders as a “permanent aircraft carrier”. In any event, since it’s only about 21 hundred miles southeast of Pyongyang, N Korea, this tiny US Territory is of considerable interest to Kim Jong-un, North Korea’s “Supreme Leader”.

Japan, one of many U S allies, is also of strategic interest to Kim, perhaps because there are more US military personnel serving in Japan than in any other country: 39,345 troops are stationed on 112 bases, mostly on the subtropical island of Okinawa, roughly 800 miles (1,280km) south west of Tokyo.

Headquartered in Japan, is the Seventh Fleet; it’s the largest of the US navy’s deployed sea forces, with roughly 50—70 ships and submarines, 140 aircraft, ballistic missile interceptors, and long-range Tomahawk land attack missiles.  The antiaircraft ships often include up to 14 cruisers and destroyers, some of which are armed with both defensive and offensive fleet missiles; as many as 12 nuclear-powered submarines are also “on call” 24/7, and finally the nuclear-powered supercarrier, the USS Ronald Regan, is permanently deployed at Yokosuka, Japan, as the 7th fleet’s flagship. 

Set up as a safeguard against North Korea in 1957 after the three-year “Police Action”, the United States Force Korea (USFK) says its mission is to “deter aggression and, if necessary, defend the Republic of Korea”.  After Germany, South Korea is the third largest host of US military forces, with 23,468; equipped with over 300 tanks (the powerful M1 Abrams among them), and armored vehicles.


So as to strengthen South Koreas defensive posture, in April of 2017, the US installed a Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense system (“THAAD”), within a small community 135 miles (217km) southeast of Seoul, South Korea’s capital and largest city, with the specific purpose of intercepting and destroying incoming missiles from North Korea in mid-flight.


But just how effective is the Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense system, or “THAAD”?   Well, it’s good, but no magic bullet.   Experts contend that countries that try to build missile defense systems, such as South Korea, should aim for a multi layered defense system; so in addition to THAAD, the sea-based Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System (Aegis BMD or ABMD) is currently the best compliment to THAAD, it fires from warships; can cover larger areas and is considerably more mobile. And finally the most recent design of short-range Patriot missiles — the Patriot PAC-3 — can also shoot down ballistic missiles, but only at short range. All of these weapons can be connected to the same sensor and command network; so a synchronized defense is possible.

To date, THAAD has a good record in actual field tests, most recently destroying a target simulating a missile comparable to N Korea’s Hwasong-12 in July of 2017.
                        
Trouble is, Missile defense, though very attractive, is a bit of tricky strategy when dealing with offensive missile threats. It has been likened to “hitting a bullet with a bullet”, and testing such systems can’t be done on the cheap. The payoff, of course, is protection from enemy ballistic missiles, which proved somewhat effective in the first gulf war when defending the Soviet made Scud missile attacks with Patriot missiles.
                                                                                                                                   
Just so you know, a THAAD battery costs about $900 Million; one Aegis BMD system costs about $718 Million; and a Patriot missile runs about 3 Million Dollars each.

So, exactly who is North Korea and where’d she come from?  Officially, she’s known as the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK); with the unsavory reputation of being the most heavily sanctioned state in the world!

For 35 years (1910 — 1945) all of Korea was under oppressive Japanese military rule, as was the case during World War II, however, this ended after U.S. and Soviet forces captured the peninsula near the war’s end, which led to the UN dividing Korea into two occupation zones, with the United States overseeing the southern half of the peninsula and the Soviet Union administering the area north of the 38th parallel (“the Demilitarized Zone”) — thus establishing a North and South Korea. This division was meant to be temporary and the initial idea was to reunify North & South to a single Korea— however this plan was dependent upon the United States, the United Kingdom, the Soviet Union, and the Republic of China organizing a single unified government scenario that would work.   

Nationwide elections were scheduled to establish a new Korean government and her leaders, however due to a lack of support in the Soviet controlled sector; the election only involved South Korea . . . In-other-words, the divided peninsula remained in place; as is true today.

China and North Korea have been allies since the end of the Second World War and her resilience stems, to a large degree, from her economic links with China.  You see, commerce with China accounts for as much as 90% of North Korea’s total foreign trade—simply put . . . China provides North Korea with most of the small country’s food and energy.   Keep in mind though that China and N Korea share a common border of 880 miles (1,420 km); so, no one was shocked, when, during the Korean War from 1950 to 1953, China supported North Korea by sending an estimated 3 million soldiers into the conflict; resulting in as many as 180,000 Chinese soldiers being killed.

Regardless, following WW II, North Korea was under the rule of the Soviets from 1945 to 1948.  After all, they had been a key player in liberating the peninsula in 1945, so, it was of little surprise when the Soviet 64th Fighter Aviation Corps took part in the Korean War by providing North Korea and China with badly needed aircraft pilots. However, many “Western” nations were most pleased when the Soviet government began to reduce aid to the North during the Glasnost era initiated by General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev during the late 1980’s in favor of reconciliation with South Korea. 
  

So, why would N Korea consider the US such an unsavory adversary? First, North Korea teaches its citizens from a tender age that the US started the Korean War and only the Kim family can protect them — and yes, they believe it without question.  Second, during the War, the U.S. Air Force bombed and napalmed parts of North Korea leaving 20% of its population dead and the survivors have shared their memories with North Korea’s youth.   Third, the United States considers South Korea the sole legitimate representative of all of Korea; hence, North Korea has not received diplomatic recognition from the US.  Fourth, the N Korean government contends  that the US is a “capitalist imperialist” successor to Japan, a view the citizenry holds to be true.  And finally, and some say of most significance, the nearly 24,000 US troops stationed in South Korea is considered an on-going threat to North Korea’s existence as a state.


Officially, the Atlantic hurricane season began on June 1 and will officially end on November 30th; however, activity began earlier than usual this year (2017) — for the third consecutive year. NOAA forecasters predict the “season has the potential to be extremely active, and could be the most active since 2010.”  Though NOAA’s outlook still calls for 5 to 9 hurricanes for the entire season; currently (September 23) the total stands at 7 — thus far, the 2017 season is the first of record to usher in three Atlantic hurricanes making landfall onto the United States at Category 4 intensity or higher. 

To date, the most active Atlantic hurricane season was 2005 which recorded 15 hurricanes. The least active year was 1914, with only one known tropical storm developing during that year—it failed to reach hurricane strength.  The only other season of record without a hurricane was 1907; however 5 tropical storms did occur.

In any event, AccuWeather President Joel Myers said he believes “Hurricane Harvey was the most costly weather event in U.S. history, and that – paired with Hurricane Irma – the two storms would collectively cost the US 290 Billion Dollars”.   Conversely, Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, has a less dire opinion; he estimated a cost of only 200 Billion Dollars.  As for Hurricane Maria’s total damage estimates to Porto Rico, the total is not yet complete.

2017 Meteorological Records and or Notable Facts:
Hurricane Harvey— Post-Landfall Record: 51.88” of rainfall at Cedar Bayou, TX; most ever recorded in the continental United following a storm’s landfall — just 0.12” shy of the full United States record set in Hawaii of 52 inches in 1979. Harvey likely broke that record too since it was still raining at time the rain gauge failed.

Hurricane Irma: Intensity/Day Measurements — 185 mph max winds for 37 hours — the longest any cyclone, hurricane or typhoon, around the globe has maintained that intensity on record. The previous record was Typhoon “Haiyan” in the NW Pacific at 24 hours, a record set in 2013.                                                   

Hurricane Maria: In hurricane Maria’s aftermath (9-21-2017), all of Puerto Rico lost electricity; entire towns were flooded, streets where turned to rivers and excessive winds (155 mph) fell trees and demolished homes.  As for Maria’s monetary damage to the US territory of Porto Rico, whose economy was in shambles even prior to the storm, preliminary damage estimates stand somewhere between 40 and 85 Billion Dollars;  according to catastrophe-modeling firm AIR Worldwide—sadly, that estimate does not include losses to infrastructure, boats, or damage to uninsured properties. Worse still, AIR estimates that only about 50% of homes in Puerto Rico have insurance policies that cover wind damage  — far less than is typical throughout US states.

As for the Pacific Ocean’s hurricanes, typhoon, and cyclones it can be a bit confusing.  As you know in the southwestern Pacific and Indian Ocean, they’re “cyclones;” in the northwestern Pacific, the same powerful storms are “typhoons;” and in the northern Pacific, like the Atlantic, the storms are termed “hurricanes," named after the Caribbean god of evil, Hurrican.


There is extensive scientific evidence that extreme events are increasing around the globe, and is forecast to “snowball”— here’s just a few examples:

Over the last several weeks extremely heavy monsoon rains have killed more than 1,000 people across Bangladesh, India, and Nepal, and more than 41 million people have suffered the direct impact of the excessive rain; British Columbia is currently experiencing its most despicable wildfire season in recorded history; heat waves and drought are driving a strong wildfire season that has the American West ablaze; all 39 counties in the US state of Washington are under a state of emergency — highlighted by ash falling like snow in Seattle; the smoke, resulting from the wild fires is affecting air quality as distant as the  East Coast.

Okay, so extreme weather is to be expected in August and September, after all, those months are amid hurricane and wildfire season . . . It’s summer in the northern hemisphere, so it always gets pretty hot in a lot of places . . .  And in South Asia, it is monsoon season too—trouble is, scientists and or climatologists agree that the ongoing extreme weather events are some of the most extreme ever experienced and are threatening more human lives than is usually the case.
          
Then there’s the ripple effects, that most of us don’t think about until they affect us directly: Oil and gas infrastructure in the Gulf region is at risk—as was clearly demonstrated with recent hurricane Harvey, electric power outages are already becoming routine as the transport of coal by rail, and especially by barge, across the Midwest and Northeast face more flooding disruptions, and electricity generation in the Southwest will soon be limited by water shortages as heat waves and droughts become more extreme.  

Bet you never thought Global Warming could have a negative impact on allergies — well consider this: Respiratory allergies are expected to worsen significantly for approximately 25 million Americans! One of several causes include the fall ragweed “crop”; it’s projected to thrive and become more irritating because of increased carbon dioxide levels. Ragweed plants at today’s carbon dioxide levels are likely to produce nearly twice as much pollen as they did, just a 100 years ago.  Already, costs for allergies and asthma in the United States stands at near 33 Billion Dollars every year in direct health care costs and lost productivity.

Then there’s the huge cost per year for a US universal health care plan to deal with;  a sentiment currently (2017) favored by more than 60% of Americans — and for many of us, the monotony associated with basic math — yes, the numbers are huge but in the end, the math is basic.  In the worst case scenario, cost estimates stand at 1.38 Trillion Dollars ($1,380,000,000,000.00) per year for the plan historically proposed by Senator Bernie Sanders.

According to the 2017 federal budget outline, the US is already committed to Spend, on Medicare & Health, 1.17 Trillion Dollars ($1,170,000,000,000.00) — so an additional 210 Billion Dollars (210,000,000.00) is required to reach full health care coverage costs as described above (1.38 Trillion Dollars).  Simply put, absent a major tax increase or a dramatic shift in how the federal government’s receivables are dispersed, the future of full health care coverage for every American is bleak at best!   Especially when considering that by the end of Fiscal Year 2017 the US federal government debt is estimated to reach 20.4 Trillion Dollars and the annual deficit is estimated to be 443 Billion Dollars; an improvement on the 2016 deficit of 585 Billion Dollars but the government’s total budget disbursements still exceed its total receipts for both the fiscal years (e.g. fiscal year beginning October 1, 2016 and ending September 30, 2017).

In fiscal year 2018, the federal budget forecast is 4.094 Trillion Dollars, while the US General Accounting Office guesstimates it will receive 3.654 Trillion Dollars in revenue. Yep, that results in a 440 Billion Dollar deficit for October 1, 2017 through September 30, 2018 and that’s a far cry from the 2009 deficit of 1.4 Trillion Dollars and yes the current trend is definitely heading in the right direction — nearly a Trillion Dollars within a 9 year span; that’s great—right?  At that pace, if we could only rid ourselves of those nasty annual deficits, the nation could almost have a surplus within a little less than 184 years (9 x 20.4 = 183.6) . . . Has such an event (budget surplus) occurred in recent history? Check-out the display below:


Okay, 210 Billion additional Dollars in funding is necessary to reach universal health care coverage — but is such a scenario even possible without raising taxes? In a word: Yes, but America’s love affair with unbridled military spending and rampant waste must end! 

Sooo, if you’re elected president within the next few years, to succeed, perhaps you will consider parts of or all of the following agenda:

   1. Withdraw all US troops and personnel from South Korea, except those located at the Chinhae Naval Base located on the south eastern coast of South Korea . . . But only after installing several more THAAD systems south of the Demilitarized Zone—well beyond the reach of North Korea’s conventional artillery and short-range rockets, including her Scud missiles. After all, what are US troops stationed near the 38th Parallel — other than live American made “targets” intended specifically for North Korea?  


   2. Relocate a large part of the US Naval 7th fleet to the west side of Japan into the Sea of Japan — particularly the ships equipped with the Aegis BMD or ABMD missile defense systems and simultaneously reassign the fleet’s base from Japan to the Chinhae Naval Base in southern South Korea. 


   3. Close and or withdraw all US troops and personnel from Japan—including those on the subtropical island of Okinawa, Japan.


   4. The military budget, will in all likelihood, be in excess of 650 Billion Dollars in years to come, excepting revenues designated for Veterans Affairs and Foreign Aid; especially when considering past years and the 2018 military budget forecast.
                      
With this in mind, the elimination of US Military Aid to all foreign countries and US Economic Aid to wealthy nations like Israel who received 3.1 Billion Dollars in Economic Aid in 2016 is a must — such an action can easily be justified, as Israel’s Universal Health Plan was ranked fourth in the world in terms of efficiency as recently as 2014  . . . Such cutbacks will yield a savings of 10.9 Billion Dollars or more per year; and too, such savings should be applied exclusively to the US National Debt which currently stands at 20.4 Trillion Dollars.


   5. Reduce the Military Budget by a minimum of 210 Billion Dollars and apply it to a Universal Health Care program.   For example if using the above style 2018 Budget numbers, such a reallocation would be as follows: Military Spending, 442.60 Billion Dollars — still 2 times more than China spends per year ($215 Billion) . . . 6 times more than Russia spends ($69 Billion) . . . and 59 times more than North Korea’s military expenditures ($7.5 Billion); US Veterans Affairs expenditures would remain the same at $178.10 Billion and Foreign Aid or Economic Aid would be reduced to 26 Billion Dollars or less.

  
   6.  Perhaps it is unfortunate that a comprehensive or total tally of public disaster-related spending in the United States simply does not exist.  FEMA and several other federal agencies such as the Departments of Defense, Health and Human Services, and Housing and Urban Development have spent Millions of Dollars on disaster response and recovery for the past several years.  In truth, the total funds required to satisfy such a need is simply an unknown.

Considering the anticipated disastrous impact of inclement weather events that are  believed by the vast majority of the worlds climatologist’s that will soon become commonplace on the US and her territories, it is no longer an option to continue squandering our economic resources on forever building and maintaining a military machine that is expected or destined to “police” the world.  With this foremost in mind, as citizens who hope to survive as a nation into the 22nd century and beyond, we must recognize the necessity to quit forever the folly of always outspending militarily, potential adversaries by 100% or much, much more.  That’s not saying that to maintain a military is no longer a necessity—in fact such a circumstance may be a century or more away!    

This of course is only an opinion, one of many, and you may not even run for president, ever; even though it is the platform best suited for implementing all or even a few of the above suggested subject matters / issues. 


In any event, if you do decide to pursue the US Presidency, keep in mind that simply being a Billionaire will not necessarily get you the coveted prize. Case-in-point, a fella named Ross Perot tried in 1992 and again in 1996 — he failed on both attempts — at the time his net worth was actually 4.1 Billion Dollars — however he often implied it was only 3.8 Billion.  On the other hand the current US President’s net worth when he entered the 2016 presidential race was really 3.5 Billion Dollars, although he often claimed his net worth was 10 Billion Dollars or more.  Point being, making “colorful” claims and using “alternative facts” may be the sure way to becoming leader of the free world. 

Click Here to view a 1992 SNL spoof preserved by YouTube and see what probably won’t help get you elected.   

The argument is often made that American citizenship was most eloquently reckoned in The Declaration of Independence back in 1776, which states that “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” are all natural born rights.  Bottom line: it’s only possible to achieve such rights when proper health care is available to every citizen; there is reasonable protection from inclement weather events—including droughts, wildfires, and rising sea levels; when a low risk of being “wiped out” by a foreign power is insured by the government; and finally, when the absence of excessive taxation by said government is assured.



Sources: